But in court, a Pfizer scientist denied that Pfizer endorsed Theranos, adding that no employees approved the document she sent while in talks about the deal. Theranos entered into deals with Walgreens and Safeway that year. Yet Pfizer’s logo appeared prominently in the document, which indicated that the pharmaceutical giant endorsed Theranos’ technology. This is a direct response to a key claim from the prosecution, which produced evidence that Holmes sent Walgreens a document in 2010 called “Pfizer Theranos System Validation Final Report.” As it turned out, this document was created by Theranos staff, not Pfizer. ![]() Her defense also pulled up a study from Johns Hopkins University from around the same time, which called the Theranos technology “ novel and sound.” She said in court that she wishes she had handled the situation differently, but that she had included the Pfizer logo because Theranos had done some testing with Pfizer before they decided not to work together. Holmes has also denied that she was trying to lead Walgreens astray by sending the company documents with the unauthorized use of Pfizer’s logo. Gibbons died by suicide in 2013 while employed at Theranos, days before he was to be summoned to appear in court about a Theranos-related patent dispute. Holmes’ defense has produced emails from high-ranking lab officials like chief scientist Ian Gibbons, who said that Theranos machines had “demonstrated capabilities fully equivalent to lab methods in areas where we have done assay development.” Holmes testified that Gibbons’ emails indicated that Theranos’ 4.0 Edison machine “ could run any test,” per live courtroom reporting from Law 360’s Dorothy Atkins (the trial is not livestreamed). Since Holmes isn’t a trained scientist, she says she listened to the guidance of the experts she hired - she even testified that scientists and engineers designed a slide deck presented to investors. She claims that when she told stakeholders about the capabilities of Theranos’ technology, she was conveying what she thought was the truth. So far, Holmes has stuck to her argument that while Theranos made errors, the startup’s failure wasn’t fraud. If convicted, each count could land her up to 20 years in prison. The former Silicon Valley hotshot faces two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and nine counts of wire fraud. ![]() ![]() Secretary of Defense James Mattis, whistleblower Erika Cheung, Theranos patients, investors, medical professionals and journalists - Holmes is telling her side of the story under oath, her defense aiming to build the case that she did not knowingly defraud her investors. Now that the prosecution has rested its case - questioning witnesses like former U.S. So it was a shock late Friday afternoon when the Stanford dropout took the stand, 11 weeks after the trial began. One of the biggest mysteries in former Theranos founder and CEO Elizabeth Holmes’ high-profile fraud trial was whether or not she would testify.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |